PokerStars Is Rigged (English Edition) eBook: Joy, Matthew: perceptive-inc.com: Kindle-Shop. perceptive-inc.com › › Strategy › For Beginners. iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ.
Stars ist rigged ^^Im vorherigen Blogeintrag verwies ich auf einen anderen Blogger, der sich grosse Mühe gemacht hat, zu testen, ob PokerStars rigged ist. Dazu hat er ein Cash. And that is that online poker rooms are somehow rigging their games for actions. In other words, they have made it so that flops, turns, and rivers connect with. Pokerstars is rigged. Gefällt 2 Mal. main goal of this page is to show everyone pokerstars is perceptive-inc.com matter how good you play,if they dont want you to.
Pokerstars Rigged Jeff Gross VLOG: $10,000,000 WPT VideoPokerstars is rigged - An investigative video proving online Pokerstars is a fraud Is poker stars rigged? the facts. 1. Play on a fixed stake and a fixed game like only a 8$ SNG man 2. Have a bankroll that is at least times the game played 3. If bad beats occuring shut off games for a week. A a lot greater concern of whether or not PokerStars video games are rigged is whether or not the corporate is definitely dishonest gamers out of winnings. A fast search on-line will reveal a pointy improve within the final a number of years of gamers making complaints about having their accounts seized, bankrolls decreased when making a withdrawal, withdrawals refused, bonuses voided for no purpose and so forth. But does this mean PokerStars is rigged? Or maybe, just maybe, our process thinking is actually flawed? Yes, it is true, ALL online poker sites, including PS, need to be audited seriously by public organizations that actually care about the safety of its citizens and not by private companies based on some financial heavens like the perceptive-inc.com petition suggests. Many of you will say "this happens in Poker". I agree. But on PokerStars, it happens way too frequently to be "random". You can actually predict the run-out. PokerStars Casino is launched, adding casino-style games to the poker client for the first time ever. November PokerStars announces some significant changes to their rewards program, most importantly announcing their long-standing Supernova and Supernova Elite tiers will no longer exist. Display as a link instead. Join Us. One of the main draws of PokerStars is the tournament offerings thanks to its status as the 1 Poker Club Montreal poker room in the world in Lotttozahlen of traffic. Turns out the casual audience is every bit as fickle as the nightmares of the marketing department fear they are. 5/2/ · Rihard4a: Okay guys, me and my fellow poker player study group came to conclusion that stars is rigged. This is for real, no joke. Just take a look. Every hand is like this. Really rigged! PROOF STARS RIGGED lql Do not put your money in there! You have been warned. 7/5/ · Pokerstars — rigged/fixed software. W WARNING POKERSTARS AND FULL TILT RIGGED. This review was posted by a verified customer. Verified customer Review updated: Jul 05, Warning to all Hold them poker players: This site is is using fixed software to determine outcome of poker tournaments! I have played hundreds of times and seen the. 6/14/ · Strange betting patterns, fake accounts, unbelievable plays and rigged flops to create action. We are all well aware of petitions online and its a known fact that Pokerstars has people working on numerous forums such as 2+2 right the way up to senior management perceptive-inc.com we will release the information we gathered in segments over the coming /5(3).
Die Mindesteinzahlung Pokerstars Rigged nur 20в Pokerstars Rigged die maximale Einzahlung ist 4. - Latest changesDer Rake geht an das Haus. Habe schon oft beim spiel bemerkt, wenn ich ein Tournament und Cash game gleichzeitig spiele, dass ich VIEL, VIEL bessere Karten konstant beim Turnier. Im vorherigen Blogeintrag verwies ich auf einen anderen Blogger, der sich grosse Mühe gemacht hat, zu testen, ob PokerStars rigged ist. Dazu hat er ein Cash. And that is that online poker rooms are somehow rigging their games for actions. In other words, they have made it so that flops, turns, and rivers connect with. iluya: Sagt mal bin ich der einzige bei dem Pokerstars das varianzreichste ist was es gibt? Auf die letzten 25k Hands mit AA KK AK QQ AQ AJ.
We all may have theories and can all see the benefits of a "rigged" site, after all they make money from rake and entry fees and there is a lot more we can go into regarding this but for now we just want to stick to the FACTS.
We will publish more data over the coming days. As mentioned previously we have detailed data, Boom replays to support our findings but would like to hear from anyone else who has experienced anything they feel could help support this research so we can present a full unbiased report to the DOJ.
It's not surprising you can find unusual play when you sift through a large amount of data. Some players like to gamble Also lol at the eastern European thing.
I've met quite a few via poker that I speak to on skype and they do all pretty much speak perfect English. You do know it's the number 1 most spoke language in the world right?
Unless you post who the poker players, statisticians and industry experts are, this has no legitimacy.
Where is the summary of your analysis in statistical form? Two threads merged and moved to bad beats. Please post any variance or bad beat related topics in the bad beat forum going forward.
Constructive comment, 36k hands is nothing, should be easy to get your hands on over 1 million "random" hands. Less constructive, but reality based comments.
I am not sure why the DOJ would care about this considering PokerStars isn't operating there, but I would hope that this biased study on a small sample size wouldn't sway them anyway.
This is another tin foil hat thread with no evidence being posted even in this tiny sample size. Love the bias in your OP despite the fact you insist on being unbiased.
It's perfectly acceptable to not post who is involved until the study is complete. Most people aren't even announcing stuff like this before the study is complete.
I had regged a few SCOOP events for tonight but after reading through the findings of your rigorous experiment I snap unregged. I didn't see Player X in the lobby but couldn't take the chance because those sneaky Eastern Europeans like to late-reg.
That's the point. If you're going to announce something as fact and then not provide any substantive evidence or provide the authors who might lend credibility if legitimate , then you shouldn't be making the post to begin with.
You want to hear a strange occurrence? I think not. Weird, eh? My findings astounded me. Strange betting patterns and unbelievable plays, yet he was somehow still winning pots.
AND he was able to speak perfect English and use the correct dialect, as I purposely engaged him in conversation.
Just my 5 pence wurth ; I sincerely suggest that if house bots on are on the normal schedule whos the top mtt players playing all the time on the same tournaments.
I would like to think I actually could play all these suckers live ,its just a shame I blew my whole entire roll at highstakes plo and and mentally ill due to my 8 year losing run at onliner poker.
Its a shame english french and german are the only languages i kinda know about. GO play live if you want a real game. The problem: How to get people hooked on to the site, to keep them depositing more and more money, and generate more rake?
Solution: Action flops, manipulated RNG so that it is able to generate 5 random results until the one it needs, as they themselves write in their terms and conditions that results of rng can be neglected for 5 times, this is a good way to manipulate.
Technological solution: Profile the players, the regular sharks need to be controlled otherwise they will devour the beginners, so deliver bad beats to them so that they get in line with the skill of a novice.
Make novice's win to retain them, keep tilting sharks, so they keep com. How to protect over selves? Hide in countries without government regulation where you can buy the government like gibraltar, keep source code secret, get audits done from bought auditors.
I have played years and years on this site, and can vouch that it follows the full tilt approach and is minting money by hooking unsuspecting fishes, it is making at least a ten thousand dollars of profit a day.
If they were not to adopt these shady practices their site traffic would not peak at but would be about If they were not to do this then their day profit would not become usd but remain that their monthly profit.
I remember a decent marketing campaign with PokerStars trotting out familiar faces like Negreanu and Moneymaker.
It was supposed to be the next big mobile poker thing. Turns out the casual audience is every bit as fickle as the nightmares of the marketing department fear they are.
Keep it up, PokerStars. Too many competitors are spinning their wheels. This is one of the few groups still trying to stay ahead of the curve.
Although it was once the weakest aspect of the poker room PokerStars has made a concerted effort to improve its promotional offerings in recent years.
While I understand the desire to let the quality of the software and games speak for themselves the non-US market has simply become too competitive with new player packages to offer half-baked incentives.
Secondly, players are given 6 months to clear the bonus through cash game or tournament play whereas most other poker rooms only give you a month or two.
There are 7 different VIP tiers that require as little as player points per month to earn or as many as 1,, per year.
As you reach higher tiers you have earn points more frequently and have access to better promotions. The biggest criticism I have for the program is that players are forced to hit specific player point thresholds each and every month in order to maintain their tier in the VIP Club.
I personally like to hop around different poker rooms, spreading my playing time between whoever currently has the better cash games and promotions.
I understand that PokerStars wants to encourage regular play and they have always done an excellent job of cultivating player loyalty.
While they have always offered free books, tournament tickets, and merchandise for player points PokerStars has beefed up the rewards in recent years.
Points can now be exchanged for cash and there are a number of private VIP freeroll tournaments taking place at least weekly. Wrapping up the promotional offerings are a number of region-specific events that are only offered for players in certain parts of the world such as Asia, Australia, Brazil, Latin America, Portugal, and Norway.
Although neither is truly better than those offered by their main competitors with the enormous number of games and tournaments offered getting anything extra is appreciated.
Life offers 3 certainties every day: the sun will rise, the sun will set, and the PokerStars cash games will be tighter than the Gordian knot.
That means fewer casual players dumping chips to the grinders just for the experience. PokerStars has always been the poker room du jour of the online poker elitist, wannabe poker pro, dedicated grinder, and serious tournament player.
The problem with that in the game quality context is that those are the tightest and most well-educated poker groups there are.
There is some degree of change as the games get slightly looser at the penny games rather than the dollar ones but even those micro limit players fight surprisingly hard for each penny.
Check my tips section for more thoughts. Playing games here is a different beast in that most players are either timid or just good players.
Cash games may not be the most profitable on average here but they can be refreshing for players burned out on bad beats.
Casual recreational players, i. PokerStars started their assault on grinders users third-party software, who could realistically kill the industry if given enough time to drive away recreational players.
The poker room severely limited HUDs heads-up displays and other third-party poker tracking software to try to marginalize the unfair advantage they were gaining over pure players.
With the proliferation of rock-tight games over the past years I love the movement by poker sites of purifying the games again and protecting the essential part of the poker ecosystem: inexperienced players.
One of the main draws of PokerStars is the tournament offerings thanks to its status as the 1 online poker room in the world in terms of traffic.
They have an unmatched number of satellites not only to live tournaments, but also to their own guaranteed events. Tournaments are structured well by providing an easy-to-understand lobby, giving players a l arge amount of starting chips relative to the blinds, and allowing sufficient time between blinds.
I prefer this structure personally as it tends to give a slightly larger edge towards skilled players. As PokerStars has been experiencing a huge boost in overall traffic the past few years the tournament traffic is massive.
Not everything has worked — remember Duel? See the chart below for the exact numbers. This is a strange timed tournament where play just stops after 5 minutes no matter how many players are left.
With several thousand players competing for even the micro buy-in overnight events every tournament is a spectacle and every tournament offers substantial prizes.
And is this Fuckpokerstars. Well to some degree it is and you will have the read the next lines to find out why. Besides their countless horror hands that you can experience yourself by just grinding online poker and some very questionable plays in the process basically how NOT to play your big hands , Fuckpokerstars.
The outcome was 1,, tournament hands selected and analyzed carefully. According to Fuckpokerstars. Moreover, in the Ax vs. And the Ax vs.
Aces galore on PokerStars right? Well, for one who has played a fair amount of tournaments on PokerStars as of late, this is not quite news. And yes, you would even agree that the action postflop is way over the limit - big hands running into bigger and bigger and bigger hands - compared to some other smaller online poker sites.
But does this mean PokerStars is rigged? Or maybe, just maybe, our process thinking is actually flawed? Yes, it is true, ALL online poker sites, including PS, need to be audited seriously by public organizations that actually care about the safety of its citizens and not by private companies based on some financial heavens like the Fuckpokerstars.
But to call PokerStars scammy is way over-the-top. What we should do first is actually look in the mirror, study our play and see what we have actually done wrong and how we could have played a certain hand better.
And since you want to play on the biggest poker site of them all, don't forget to think about variance as well - you will play MTTs on PokerStars against thousands of players so you will have to win many, many flips not to mention give several bad beats in the process to emerge victorious.
However, if you play on a smaller site with only several hundred players per MTT, you will have to win way less hands in order to reach the top of the ladder.
Bigger hands situations. Just take a deck of cards, shuffle it yourself, deal like in a regular Holdem game and behold the RNG in action.
How many bad beats did you see? What do you think?David on May 24, at am. The odds of getting a flush and straight are exactly the same live as they are online. Gemäss errechneter Bitcoin Mining Pool Deutsch hätte der Favorit 99x gewinnen sollen.